Featured

How a Black Man Survives a Police Encounter when Armed.

I hesitated to watch the shooting and killing of Philando Castile, but I did. I also kept up with the reporting on the testimony of the officer that shot and killed Mr. Castile. Like I have always predicted, the easiest thing to blame a dead person for is drug use. For Black men, its marijuana use. The officer that killed Mr. Castile, and was acquitted of all criminal charges relating to the shooting, testified that he thought the if Mr. Castile had “the audacity to smoke marijuana in front of the five-year-old girl”  then, “what care does he [Mr. Castile] give about me?” Really? Someone acting under the color of authority granted to him by Mr. Castile’s government just linked smoking pot, something that has become increasingly legal and beneficial, to a depraved heart that led this government official to have no choice but to execute him? The same officer mentioned something about Mr. Castile’s nose that seemed rather racially insensitive. Stereotypes like these seem common in many police departments and that fact shapes many minorities (that are subject of those negative stereotypes) interactions with law enforcement.

Here is the #commonground:

If we are contemplating war with North Korea over their murder of Otto Warmbier, we should have the same common outrage for what just happened in the trial of Mr. Castile’s shooter. See, Otto stole a banner in a sovereign that is brutal, authoritative, and conniving. Unfortunately, he has paid his life for it. That brutal regime can not go unchallenged. Similarly, Mr. Castile was exercising his constitutional right to “keep and bear arms.” Which brings me to the topic of how a Black man exercising his 2nd amendment right should handle compelled interactions with law enforcement.

First and foremost, like my Law School Professor and Advisor has widely warned: Don’t talk to the police, unless they compel you to give a response. In Mr. Castile’s case, he was pulled over because the officer had cause to believe that his taillights were broken. Mr. Castile, especially with a weapon in the car, had very little choice but to interact with the officer. While the shooter’s partner stood on the other side of the car without even touching his weapon, which could indicate that the shooter’s partner felt no threat from Mr. Castile, Mr. Castile informed the officer that he was armed. Seconds later, he was shot, and soon after, dead.

What we learn from this interaction and result of Mr. Castile’s shooter’s trial, is that if you are a minority, especially a Black male, and you are armed, and the officer becomes aware that you are armed, and your hands are not secure, you are automatically a threat to that officer’s life. Especially, if you have smoked pot in the past. So, here is what should be done upon an interaction with law enforcement when armed and Black.

  1. If driving, immediately place both of your hands on the steering wheel. If on foot, immediately raise both hands.
  2. Before talking to the officer, say a quick prayer asking for wisdom.
  3. Tell the officer that you are placing your hands on the steering wheel (or in the air) as a lifesaving gesture. Inform the officer that you will not use your hands unless instructed to do so.
  4. Inform the officer that you are legally armed and have the documentation to prove it but will not be able to access it with your hands because you are in fear for your life.
  5. Ask the officer if he can please call for backup or handcuff you for his safety.
  6. Allow the officer or back-up officer to retrieve your documents and/or weapon allowing the situation to neutralize.

While we should not have these kinds of steps for only a class of people, it is sad that history, common practices, judicial philosophy, laws, and society has brought us to the point that practical and articulable guidance to survival while armed and Black must be provided.

It’s been a long time, Shouldn’t have left you. . .

Common Grounders,

It has been over a year since the last update. The time was used to dive deeper about what #commonground wants to accomplish with this space. During the pondering, many things happened. First, the moderator, Phillip Imanlihen, graduated from Regent University School of Law, where he was exposed to some of the greatest conservative minds, including faculty, students and members of the community. Most importantly, during this time, Phillip engaged in frank dialogues about our countries ideological and political divide. Phillip, after growing up in Chicago, attending the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and eventually moving to New York City where he attended one of the City Universities of New York, decided that Regent would, and did, give him a balance in perspective needed to navigate this new political and social landscape that a millennial like him has to navigate. It’s safe to say that Phillip has entrenched himself in both sides of this hypothetical “line” that divides and seems to now threaten our democracy, as we know it. Second, President Trump got elected, inaugurated, nominated and confirmed a Supreme Court Justice. Third, our politics are plain nasty. Recently, a Congressman from Louisiana, Steve Scalise and others, were ambushed at a GOP baseball practice, it’s bad!

But, as the great Theologian, Thomas Aquinas, said: “better to illuminate than merely to shine, to deliver to others contemplated truths than merely to contemplate” which leads to move from contemplation to delivery.  Our goal, simply, is to find #commonground, thus, this space is meant to facilitate that goal. To facilitate that goal, we must create an online environment that allows Americans to realize that we all have #commongrond. To reach our goal, our space must do the following:

  • It must find #commonground between this hypothetical “line” that has for so long divided us; so,
  • this space will be for people with different ideas that can still find common ground for the greater good of our politics; plus,
  • our space will be find where our politicians agree and highlight it; while
  • finding ways to find #commonground on the policies that brings disagreement.

If we are able to find #commonground on issues in which we disagree, we are making progressive steps towards creating policies that works for all Americans. At Common Ground Analysis our goal is to find a place where, for example, Democrats and Republicans, minorities and law enforcement,  organizations like the ACLU and the ACLJ, can interact and learn from each other to find #commonground.

Moving policies that affect everyday Americans forward while bringing congress’s approval rating out of a hole can only be done with #commonground.

Ted Cruz Stands Up for True Conservatism.

Wow! Just Wow! W-O-W. Wow. Did you see that? Well if you didn’t let me explain.

Ted Cruz spoke at the Republican National Convention on Wednesday, July 20th.  The speech by Cruz was touted as the highlight of the night, overshadowing the Vice Presidential nominee’s speech.  Well, Ted Cruz delivered. Withstanding the boos and the negative feedback from the crowd, Ted set up, in his speech, what everyone watching thought would be his much anticipated endorsement of Donald Trump and his presidential campaign. Instead of delivering an endorsement for Donald Trump and feeding the crowd what they wanted to hear, Ted said “vote your conscious.” Vote your conscious. That was it, Cruz went on to mention voting “up and down” the ballot, but he never said vote Trump.

Ted Cruz stood up for true conservatism and did not endorse someone that many conservatives believe does not uphold the true principals of conservatism. I have to say that what Cruz did gave me a renewed faith that conservatives are not blind party loyalists. What Ted Cruz did was tell America that he does not believe that Donald Trump will win in November and thus can not define the real conservative.

See, Ted has argued before the Supreme Court multiple times, he is a smart man.  He is a man that still wants to be President. He is a man that knows support for Trump will equate him with all the other Republicans that seem like hypocrites when they endorse Trump. Republicans like Trump’s running mate, Pence, endorsed Cruz, not his now running mate. How hypocritical is that? Ben Carson, who Trump referred to as a child molester and who in turn jabbed back by being  “Terrible At Being A Donald Trump Surrogate”

Ted Cruz, unlike these other Republican that jumped on the bandwagon of Trump, rejected Trump’s redefinition of conservatism. Ted Cruz refused to endorse Donald Trump.  I am happy for him, and as I tweeted, Cruz converted me into a fan today.

How American Political Parties responded to #Turkey

The importance of Social Media Response in the 2016 Presidential Election.

As I have been taking in the news of the coup or attempted coup in Turkey, I immediately made it political. I began to wonder how the political debate will play out. Forgive me, the political climate made me that way. To fill people in: there has been an attempted coup in Turkey.  According to reports on CNN, representatives of President Erdogan are claiming that a faction of the Army are attempting the coup.  As I speak, the Erdogan is apparently speaking to a crowd in Istanbul. I know Turkey is a vital ally and one of our few allies in a troubled region.  I wondered what the response would be and if it would fall under the typical political party lines.  Here is what I found:

President Obama has indicated that he is with the democratic elected government. John Kerry confirm with this tweet:

Hillary Clinton also gave a similar statement via twitter:

Trump on the other hand:

And of course, those that many claim represents the Republicans wants the coup to succeed:

And . . .

See how easy and quick that was able to be turned political? Nuts! Let’s see how this plays out. I am praying for common ground.

 

 

Low-energy Jeb, Lyin Ted, Little Marco. Opportunist Ben?

Will Trump pick Ben Carson as his running mate, and will it matter?

“Low-energy” Jeb, “lyin’ Ted,” “little Marco,” “crazy Megyn;” all names that Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for the 2016 presidential elections, has called his fellow party-members. His next one should be “opportunist Ben” in reference to Trump’s latest enemy turned friend, Ben Carson.  There are reports that Carson has been offered a position in a Trump administration.  While the particulars of the position have not been leaked by neither Carson or Trump, Mother Jones reports that Trump offered to make Carson his running mate.  That move makes sense.  Why else would a brain surgeon endorse a man that compared said brain surgeon’s temperament to that of a “child molester.” Is this good strategy for Trump? Can Carson, an African American, bring Trump the minority vote he so desperately needs to win the general election? A good place to begin some Common Ground Analysis is to look at the electorate and how different groups have voted in past elections.

Undeniably, Trump or the democratic nominee will need the white vote.

1984 Election chart
Source:  Cornell University 

 

Clearly,  the white vote alone will not win the election. In order to win, a candidate must garner some votes from groups other than whites. So far, Trump’s candidacy has disparaged Muslims, Hispanics, Blacks, Women and even Asians.  

Does Trump think he will win the presidency with only the white vote? Of course not!   This is why he would want to have Ben Carson as his running mate. During his victory speech following the 2016 Indiana Republican primary, Ben Carson was one of the few names mentioned by the newly proclaimed presumptive Republican nominee for the 2016 general presidential election.

#TrumpandCarson, two clear “non-establishment” candidates, will be a ticket that current GOP voters, clearly looking for non-establishment candidates, can rally behind. Imagine that middle-finger to current Washington Republicans?  Carson may also be able to deliver the minority votes for Trump.

In the 1984 election, white voters made 86 percent of the electorate, black votes made up 10 percent and Hispanics made up for only 3 percent.  In 2004, the white vote decreased to 77 percent, black votes went up to 11 percent and Hispanics grew to 8 percent.

2012 Election

 

In the historic 2008 presidential elections, that resulted in the first African-American President, the white vote again shrunk to 74 percent while the black electorate grew to 13 percent and the Hispanic electorate reached 9 percent.  Finally, in 2012, when President Obama defeated Mr. Romney, we saw the white electorate drop to 72 percent while black voters remained at 13 percent and the Hispanic electorate reached 10 percent.  

The clear trend is that the white electorate is shrinking and the minority electorate is growing. In 1984, minorities only made up 13 percent of the electorate. In 2012, the electorate was over a quarter minority.  If this trend continues, it could spell trouble for Trump. The white electorate can dip under 70 percent while minority votes can get to as high as 35 percent. There are already reports of Hispanics, once content with living in America with just a green card, making a push to gain citizenship in order to vote against Trump.   So what does Trump do? He calls on opportunist Ben, the guy that would do anything to sell books and stay in the limelight.  

2016 Election
A Common Ground  Analysis Projection

Opportunistic Ben lost his own bid for the White House. Opportunistic Ben has retired from performing neurosurgery; opportunistic Ben has run out of college speeches to give; opportunistic Ben is tired of working in the shadows. Donald Trump knows opportunist Ben just wants to be down with the right wingers. Donald Trump can gain the minority votes, he so desperately needs, if he has the black, often labeled “soft-spoken,” Ben Carson to run with him. In a general election, Trump knows he will have to deal with the Black Lives Matter movement. Trump knows that he has been labeled a racist by many progressives. Additionally many other groups, especially minorities, will be energized to protest and vote against him.  

Chicago Trump protests
Donald Trump’s campaign rally in Chicago on Friday was postponed amid growing security concerns. Several fights between Trump supporters and protesters could be seen after the announcement, as a large contingent of Chicago police officers moved in to restore order.

Who better to combat these possible derailments (and rallies) than the oft “soft-spoken” black surgeon, opportunist Ben?

Will it work?

We have to wait till the season finale in November.